.webp)
Prime Minister Mark Carney introduced his first federal budget promising generational investments to fortify the Canadian economy and inoculate it against a U.S. trade war.
Yet economic analysts say the plan falls short of delivering transformative change. Facing a minority government reliant on opposition support, Carney’s team constrained spending and tax reforms accordingly.
The budget outlines US$200 billion in infrastructure investment over five years, alongside US$42.6 billion of planned spending cuts. Ottawa projects next year’s deficit at US$55.3 billion, more than double the previous year’s shortfall, and expects it to fall to US$40.4 billion by 2030. The government estimates the U.S. tariffs will cost about 1.8 per cent of GDP.
Despite declarations of a “sea change” in method, with slower growth in official spending and tax-system revisions to spark private investment, critics say the design lacks scale. One senior analyst noted that while the budget moves in the right direction, it is not ambitious enough to catalyse the required level of private-sector commitment.
What Does This Mean for Me?
In effect, the budget strikes a cautious middle course: the infrastructure commitment is significant, yet not enough to transform an advanced economy facing mounting headwinds. With the world’s 10th largest economy under pressure, one analyst concluded that real structural change cannot be delivered by a single fiscal plan alone, and Carney’s budget lands in the “missed opportunity” file.






